Comments for Kurt Jarchow's Blog

Comment on Add Drupal Forms using AJAX by Kurt Jarchow

Kurt Jarchow — Sun, 28 Feb 2010 14:02:28 +0000

I didn’t delete it, just didn’t get a chance to approve it yet. Despite adding many spam blockers they seem to still flood my comments.

Replace this.url with the url of your form. this.url will actually only work if you are using a link.

Yes, the form should be submit without refreshing the page.

Let me know how it goes!

Comment on Add Drupal Forms using AJAX by David

David — Mon, 22 Feb 2010 13:24:07 +0000

Hi, I left a comment here a couple of days ago. Why did you delete it?

Comment on Add Drupal Forms using AJAX by David

David — Sun, 21 Feb 2010 14:21:42 +0000

Hi Kurt,

I’m trying to follow your example and I achieved to display the form via AJAX. But then the problem comes when hitting the “Submit” button. It jumps to the ‘url’ that I indicated in the ajax call.

In your code you have this.href ¿What exactly is that url?

What happens in your case when you hit “submit”.. stays in the same webpage (as Facebook comments, or jumps/refresh the page?)

I know that this post is 1 year ago and probably you don’t remember anymore about it, but it will be a great help. Thanks

Comment on SOLR 1.4 / LocalSOLR Gotchas by CraftyFella

CraftyFella — Wed, 30 Dec 2009 16:48:18 +0000

Hi,

I’ve created a guide on how to install LocalSolr onto the windows platform using Solr 1.4 as a starting point. Some of your readers may find it helpful. If so here is the link:

http://craftyfella.blogspot.com/2009/12/installing-localsolr-onto-solr-14.html

Comment on My first Google Wave Embeddy by Craig

Craig — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:51:10 +0000

Even though I have a Google Wave account it won’t let me see the “Embeddy”. It wants me to sign into wavesandbox.com and my account doesn’t work there

Comment on Blog action day by Stinky100

Stinky100 — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 08:01:57 +0000

I think shows the end result of this. ,

Comment on Blog action day by Bob56

Bob56 — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 20:28:41 +0000

It comes in quite by itself, in a highly interesting and puzzling manner, being forced upon us by entirely different considerations. ,

Comment on SOLR 1.4 / LocalSOLR Gotchas by Jason Judge

Jason Judge — Thu, 27 Aug 2009 12:11:11 +0000

That syntax for blank searches also applies to blank multi-faceted searches, where you need to use q=*:* in order to get the top-level facet counts (otherwise the search just results in an error).

– Jason

Comment on SOLR AND/OR Boolean Operators & DisMax by jarchowk

jarchowk — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:31:22 +0000

Hi Jodi,

Yes most definitely depends on your default operator.

The best way I can describe it is to think of every term having a + or – infront. Plus being AND (required), minus being OR (optional) .. if nothing, then default is used

having a default as AND:

java AND (cork OR dublin)

equals:

+java +(+cork -dublin)

so docs must have java and must have cork and may have dublin.

Very confusing.

Comment on SOLR AND/OR Boolean Operators & DisMax by Jodi

Jodi — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:08:58 +0000

plus, I’m querying with localsolr – I wonder if this is still an issue?

ty.Jodi