<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Use Twitter?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kurtjarchow.com/2009/02/11/why-use-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kurtjarchow.com/2009/02/11/why-use-twitter/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 15:19:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jarchowk</title>
		<link>http://www.kurtjarchow.com/2009/02/11/why-use-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>jarchowk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jarchowk.wordpress.com/?p=136#comment-31</guid>
		<description>I agree with you, 100%.  I don&#039;t care what my friend&#039;s ate for breakfast... but I do care when they&#039;ve found an interesting article and what they think of it, or I do care about that sale on laptops they saw at Best Buy.

I also want them to care about an opinion I have on a subject and get feedback.  I have dozens of thoughts throughout the day that more or less forgotten by the time I hit the pillow; in a collaborative environment maybe some of those thoughts could actually amount to something.

It&#039;s funny, there is nothing more mundane about people conversing, and there is nothing more powerful at the same time.  I think Facebook falls under the 1st, and hopefully Friendfeed will fall under the latter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you, 100%.  I don&#8217;t care what my friend&#8217;s ate for breakfast&#8230; but I do care when they&#8217;ve found an interesting article and what they think of it, or I do care about that sale on laptops they saw at Best Buy.</p>
<p>I also want them to care about an opinion I have on a subject and get feedback.  I have dozens of thoughts throughout the day that more or less forgotten by the time I hit the pillow; in a collaborative environment maybe some of those thoughts could actually amount to something.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s funny, there is nothing more mundane about people conversing, and there is nothing more powerful at the same time.  I think Facebook falls under the 1st, and hopefully Friendfeed will fall under the latter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OldManIn2D</title>
		<link>http://www.kurtjarchow.com/2009/02/11/why-use-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>OldManIn2D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jarchowk.wordpress.com/?p=136#comment-30</guid>
		<description>As successful as social &#039;services&#039; (which I will define as social websites that provide a social service such as twitter/friendfeed, but not social websites such as facebook) are, they use a perfect solution approach (&#039;IF everybody used them, everbody would experience exponential benefits&#039;) that I think will ultimately be their downfall.

As valuable as these social networks have the potential to be, they can only solve social problems which to be frank, I am not interested in; I&#039;m a guy,  I don&#039;t care what you&#039;re currently doing, what your eating for dinner, nor do I care about what you&#039;ve been reading.

As a software programmer I spend 10% of my day on Google looking at other solutions that I might use/learn from. This is a non-social problem that I don&#039;t see being solved by these &#039;social services&#039;, but I do hear the hype saying it will. If this was the case, then I might be more prone to use these tools, but as it stands I gain nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As successful as social &#8217;services&#8217; (which I will define as social websites that provide a social service such as twitter/friendfeed, but not social websites such as facebook) are, they use a perfect solution approach (&#8217;IF everybody used them, everbody would experience exponential benefits&#8217;) that I think will ultimately be their downfall.</p>
<p>As valuable as these social networks have the potential to be, they can only solve social problems which to be frank, I am not interested in; I&#8217;m a guy,  I don&#8217;t care what you&#8217;re currently doing, what your eating for dinner, nor do I care about what you&#8217;ve been reading.</p>
<p>As a software programmer I spend 10% of my day on Google looking at other solutions that I might use/learn from. This is a non-social problem that I don&#8217;t see being solved by these &#8217;social services&#8217;, but I do hear the hype saying it will. If this was the case, then I might be more prone to use these tools, but as it stands I gain nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
